Jon, that’s a *publisher* on the web in your view? I could have sworn that was the definition of a censor … (re: “The person with the ability to remove content”) D.
(http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/07/02/why-wikipedia-news-works/#comment-150836)
re: ” But when it comes down to a question of authority, they have the sole ability to remove content”
well… not necessarily, at least it doesn’t seem so to me: the ability to remove content seems to be *additional* to the basic function of a publisher on the web: say I used software that allowed me to post on my blog but not to remove any content (no deletions, no alterations) — would that make me NOT a publisher? D.
(http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/07/02/why-wikipedia-news-works/#comment-150838)
Jon, I just came up with that example to make it clear why I didn’t find your definition for a publisher on the web to be accurate. But it’s no big deal to me… (just a theoretical issue…) Good luck with PONAR! D.
(http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/07/02/why-wikipedia-news-works/#comment-150840)
Wednesday, July 4, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment